KilljoyBob
Sep 5 2008, 08:10 PM
Jennifer GarnerAge: 36
Where You've Seen Her: Alias, Daredevil, Elektra, Juno Jessica SimpsonAge: 27
Where You’ve Seen Her: The Dukes of Hazzard, Employee of the Month, Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica
TwinkyMaster
Sep 6 2008, 06:24 AM
I'll give you all one guess who I'm voting for.
GelfOgre
Sep 6 2008, 10:19 AM
How un-attractive is Jenifer Garner? So unattractive that'd I'd even vote for someone as repulsive as Jessica Simpson over her. Gah.
TwinkyMaster
Sep 6 2008, 11:23 AM

...That's it, Gelf! You're out of the will!
retro22
Sep 6 2008, 04:18 PM
Simpson's Boobs...but that's all she's really got for me...
My vote lies with the stealthy hero.
KilljoyBob
Sep 6 2008, 08:00 PM
Garner's not my cup of tea, but she'll get my vote over a walking dumb blonde stereotype.
Revil Fox
Sep 7 2008, 03:28 AM
Sorry Twinky. I agree with Gelfy.
Chaomancer Omega
Sep 7 2008, 12:18 PM
Garner's starting to show her age early, which is a bit sad, but she's at least aging into a handsome woman. Which is far more than I expect from Jessica Simpson. I fully expect that 9 years from now, Simpson will either look terrible or look surgeried and terrible.
Plus, Simpson's personality is actually enough to offset her looks into the negative category. She's anti-attractive. Had she only a brain, I might vote the other way, but.... no.
Soylent Daveage
Sep 8 2008, 10:18 AM
I went with Jessica Simpson based on
a) Garner's face looks all out of proportion in that photo;
b) Simpson has a cracking set of knockers in that pic.
But when all is said and done, voting for Jessica Simpson still managed to leave a bad taste in my mouth...
Trebor
Sep 9 2008, 12:23 AM
I've abstained as I'd rather not see either go on.
Oogie
Sep 9 2008, 09:13 PM
Garner actually looks better since she's had a kid, but she doesn't have the body to carry this battle.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.